The interwebs are buzzing that GQ magazine added a couple of cup sizes to "Mad Men" star January Jones on its November cover.
Now the magazine's director of photography has come forward to deny any nefarious digital photo retouching in a blog post on GQ.com.
We like a natural look - there's very minimal retouching. We'll take a pimple out or soften under eye dark circles. Or maybe there's a wrinkle in the shirt, or even dust on the lens. January Jones needed no help. Trust me.
Foxnews.com had a sneak peek of January's GQ cover shoot earlier this week, and we have our "before and after" photo essay right here so you can judge for yourself.
They are real, but not untouched. It's an old photographer/model trick. If you follow the contour, you will notice how "they" are virtually non existent under the jacket. They've been taped on the sides under the jacket to push them together, giving the illusion of something much larger. If they were really that big, you'd notice pronounced bulges at the sides of the jacket.
Bearing a C cup, I come to point out that it's hard to decide which is stupider: GQ's marketing policies (regardless of their preparations)designed to manipulate idiot men or this column trying to evaluate the degree of their crassness. Fools. She needs to put some clothes on.
It's not that the image was modified; its that the execution was so poor as to be obvious enough to result in news coverage. oops, that's what they want.
Why is it that most female celebrities think they have to have plastic breasts? I think it is disgusting. You either have it or you don't. Marlyn Monroe had it, Elizebeth Taylor had it. Many other female celebrities have it naturally. I suggest women be natural and their life will work out wonderfully. Real men do not require enhancement of their women. What would a woman think of a man who had a large plastic penis. Sickening thought isn't it.
The FOX411 Blog is your first call for celebrity and entertainment news. FOX411 brings you the latest scoops using FOX’s unmatched reach in news, entertainment, TV and the Internet. Click on back now, ya hear?
Subscribe to Comments
Subscribe to Posts
Tim Gaines
Who cares. Looks great to me
Kendogg
They are real, but not untouched. It's an old photographer/model trick. If you follow the contour, you will notice how "they" are virtually non existent under the jacket. They've been taped on the sides under the jacket to push them together, giving the illusion of something much larger. If they were really that big, you'd notice pronounced bulges at the sides of the jacket.
Ann
Bearing a C cup, I come to point out that it's hard to decide which is stupider: GQ's marketing policies (regardless of their preparations)designed to manipulate idiot men or this column trying to evaluate the degree of their crassness. Fools. She needs to put some clothes on.
AFB
SO?
CN
Um.. who cares they look nice.. Is this really important anyway?
Roger - Arizona
Doesn't really matter, enhanced or not, she just looks like any other female who does trashy photos. Nothing special about her.
deejay
Beautiful but at least air brushed.
DawgGoodie
It's not that the image was modified; its that the execution was so poor as to be obvious enough to result in news coverage. oops, that's what they want.
Gary
who cares, she looks great. Keep the pictures coming.
Frank
Why is it that most female celebrities think they have to have plastic breasts? I think it is disgusting. You either have it or you don't. Marlyn Monroe had it, Elizebeth Taylor had it. Many other female celebrities have it naturally. I suggest women be natural and their life will work out wonderfully. Real men do not require enhancement of their women. What would a woman think of a man who had a large plastic penis. Sickening thought isn't it.